Find leaks faster and with confidence

A maintenance team inspecting a compressed air system does not only need to know that pressure is being lost. They need to understand where it is happening, whether it requires action now, and how to explain the finding afterward.

In hazardous environments, that need becomes more urgent. A small gas or hydrogen leak may be impossible to see or smell, while access, wind, distance, and surrounding noise make manual inspection uncertain.

In buildings, leakage often shows up indirectly. Comfort issues, acoustic weaknesses, or reduced performance point to a problem, but not to its exact source. Finding leaks is often more difficult than expected.

What inspection teams are often blind to

Leaks produce signals before they become obvious failures. When air or gas escapes through a small opening, it creates acoustic patterns that travel beyond the point of loss. These signals are often present even when the leak itself cannot be seen, reached, or easily isolated from the surrounding environment.

This creates a gap in many inspections. Teams may know that something is wrong, but lack a reliable way to connect that suspicion to a specific location. In industrial systems, that gap appears across complex installations. In buildings, it appears at joints, seals, façade details, or envelope transitions that are difficult to assess from the surface.

What matters is not just knowing that leakage exists, but being able to associate it with a physical place and condition, in other words, something concrete enough to investigate and discuss.

Why that gap matters?

Unclear findings create real consequences.

In industrial environments, leaks can quietly increase energy loss, introduce safety risks, and add pressure to operations and maintenance. Compressed air leaks may run unnoticed for long periods. Gas or hydrogen leaks can escalate quickly, especially in regulated or hazardous contexts.

Compliance regulations, like LDAR (leak detection and repair), adds further pressure. Inspections need to be repeatable and defensible. It is not enough to suspect a leak; teams must be able to justify decisions about repair, escalation, and follow‑up.

In buildings, the cost of uncertainty is different but just as real. A space may underperform, feel uncomfortable, or fail to meet acoustic expectations. Without a way to connect symptoms to physical weak points, decisions remain broad and corrective actions remain imprecise.

Across contexts, the challenge is not awareness, it is confidence.

Why small leaks are often the hardest to deal with in a factory

Small leaks are not difficult because inspection teams lack tools or experience, they are difficult because confirmation is local and incremental.

Methods such as soapy water, sniffers, or gas detectors are effective at verifying a leak once a location is suspected. But they typically require close proximity and point‑by‑point checking. In large systems, this means that effort grows quickly as the number of possible locations increases.

As a result, inspections often rely on a combination of experience, exclusion, and manual verification. Teams may know that a leak exists and even have a good sense of where to look, but still need time to confirm which points matter and which do not.

The challenge is moving efficiently from suspicion to certainty, especially when leaks are small, distributed, or difficult to access.

Detection becomes more useful when it can be documented

Finding a leak is not the end of the task. Inspection results need to travel, the maintenance teams need to know what to repair. Compliance teams need evidence. Building specialists need to show where a weak point is and whether an intervention made a difference.

When findings cannot be clearly explained or revisited, they lose value quickly. Different stakeholders interpret the situation differently, or the context is lost by the time follow‑up decisions are made.

Inspection becomes truly useful when results can be shared, compared, and referred back to, not only observed in the moment.

Proven in hydrogen production

At H2 Production, part of CCB Energy in Norway, inspection conditions are demanding. Hydrogen is colorless, odorless, and highly flammable, and environmental factors such as wind can make traditional detection unreliable.

During a test in heavy storm, a very small hydrogen leak was identified that could easily have been missed. The situation illustrated how inspection insight can remain informative even when visibility and proximity are limited.

Get in touch!